Portrait of Charlie Munger
Business · concept
Wikipedia (opens in new tab)

Charlie Munger on Bitcoin

Staunch Bitcoin opponent (strong)

TL;DR

Charlie Munger strongly viewed Bitcoin as an inherently speculative asset that is fundamentally worthless and detrimental to society.

Key Points

  • He referred to Bitcoin as rat poison squared in a public forum in 2018.

  • Munger stated that Bitcoin is artificial gold and ultimately worthless because it creates nothing.

  • He called for aggressive government regulation, or an outright ban, on cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.

Summary

Charlie Munger expressed profound and consistent disdain for Bitcoin throughout its rise, characterizing the cryptocurrency as a terrible investment and morally suspect technology. His core argument centered on the digital asset lacking intrinsic value because it produces nothing and is not backed by any government or productive enterprise, frequently comparing it unfavorably to productive assets like farmland or businesses that generate real returns. He considered holding Bitcoin purely a speculative gamble driven by the desire for quick riches rather than sound financial principles.

He consistently advocated for stringent regulatory action against Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies more broadly, suggesting they were contrary to civilization's best interests and predicting their eventual demise or severe crackdown. His position was not rooted in a misunderstanding of the technology but rather a philosophical opposition to speculative manias that he felt distracted from value-creating endeavors. Munger often framed his opposition using colorful language, underscoring his deep conviction that the entire ecosystem represented an unfortunate societal development.

Key Quotes

I think it's perfectly asinine to even pause to think about them!

I hate the bitcoin success and I don't welcome a currency that's useful to kidnappers and extortionists and so forth.

I think it's rat poison

Frequently Asked Questions

Charlie Munger held a strongly negative view of Bitcoin, frequently calling it worthless, speculative, and detrimental to society. He believed that since it produces nothing tangible, it is fundamentally inferior to productive assets like businesses or real estate.

No, Charlie Munger never publicly changed his stance on Bitcoin and maintained his severe criticism until his passing. He consistently reinforced his initial negative assessment across multiple years and forums.

In one of his most memorable critiques, Charlie Munger called Bitcoin 'rat poison squared.' He felt this term accurately captured his conviction that the asset was a dangerous financial mania.